However, writing a medical literature review demands more from the author, as these need to be professionally compiled and explain everything with no mistakes and validations. Saying this, starting to write a literature medical review can demand a huge amount of work from the author as it needs to look as professional as it can. That is the reason for researchers to spend weeks, months and even years on one research, to make it look perfect.
This would help anyone to achieve the professionalism and the seriousness a work of this type demands. A literature review on medical subjects is a system used to study literature on a specific area in order to identify quality, potential, limitations and the importance of a certain subject.
Also, a literature review gives the necessary background of a research paper, working as an introduction and as a plan for work of greater range. When writing a review, the author should totally comprehend the subject he wants to write about, this would give more depth to the labor of writing and will help at differentiating between qualitative and quantitative data.
This difference is the one that makes all the research have a meaning, without it, the work is lost. That is why it is important to have studied the subject before, in a meticulous way, in order to make every further step easier and with more knowledge, without losing meaning or purpose.
When writing a literature review medical, there are some important steps to take in order to achieve better results. However, even when these steps are important, there are other recommendations and important things to take into account, things that have a great importance when writing a research literature review.
To accomplish a perfect medical review literature, the writer must achieve a completely professional profile and some skills of evaluation, research, and synthesis. However, the next tips on how to write a literature review medicine are as important as the previous ones that would get more insight and professionalism to the medical paper: In order to write a proper literature review medical, the topic or subject must comply with some rules.
However, the most important of them all is to make the topic work on a narrow subject and giving enough depth to make it look like it is wide. Also, it is very important to know that the activity of finding a perfect topic could take months and even years due to the importance of this factor as the whole purpose of the paper. When searching the literature to be reviewed on the topic of preference, the author must download and read all the relevant papers related to the field of study and the topic being presented.
All the investigation and research must come with the correct and meticulous approval. All of the selection processes of the ideas that are worth to be written in the paper must comply with the criteria of the work, determined by a set of the question previously created in order to know which are the important details to take into account and which are not.
If the data found is not enough to prove the validity or give importance to the subject of the paper, the data could be meta-analyzed. This means that the author must compile all the relevant data as a primary study on the field, without losing any sense on the topic and still giving the backup it needs.
Taking notes of everything that has been written is always great at writing literature medical reviews, as these will help the author to avoid writing things twice and do not forget about authors, importance, background, and meaning of every concept and explanation being written. Most types of review are often small and full ones. On the other hand, full reviews are more demanding, always needing of multiple hours of work and research, giving place to more complex and wide topics, creating more questions and portraying problems of more importance.
A literature review medical must always portray a problem or a question of importance on the field. Also, this problem should create new ideas and always be interesting to the subject being presented. This would help the author to get more recognition and the topic to be better researched. Without rambling on the content, the literature review must have a point, always concrete and with zero loose ends, while keeping it a point of interest for people.
The problem being depicted on the paper should always be of importance; however, previous studies and other papers related to the subject must be studied and given a critical review, without losing the consistency of the paper and without losing the point or the main objective of the paper question.
A literature review is like any other kind of work on paper; it must have a total consistent style and comply with certain rules. Following certain formats of style and always having well-written content, focused on the topic, critical and without losing its sense; the structure of the paper will create the whole importance of the subject being depicted. A great structure for literature reviews must consist of: It is important to note that having the feedback from people with enough knowledge in the field of medicine, will always be one of the best ways to know if the work being written is capable of meeting the standards of work in the field.
Other reviewers would also be able to find any inaccuracies, ambiguities or inconsistencies in the paper with more ease than the author, as they can work as a proof audience. This point Is of most importance in the paper. All the ideas that will come from you are always the most important to portray. If the researcher has important, relevant, objective and interesting ideas on the field while doing it in a flawless manner with a perfect literature review, the author is most likely to get more recognition.
However, all created ideas must be proved and backed up with other works and researchers, in order to not lose the objectivity and validity of the work. Using new studies to back up all ideas coming from the author of the paper are always important in any field, however, if the author takes his time to also prove all his ideas with previous findings, especially the old ones, the work can have even more validity and importance of the field, by giving a more transcendental problem a solution.
Also, it is important to know that given the immense increase of literature reviews being published nowadays, most of them could be utterly wrong, so backing up all data with previous studies on the field will give a better idea of validity to the work being presented. Even so, depending on the studies and ideas being used in the new research, all of them must totally be updated to their last form, as using outdated data from new or especially old studies gives less validity to the subject.
The more important the papers that are going to be used are, the best the research work is backed up, giving solidity to the data and losing insecurity on the work, creating a new idea that not only would need to import data but of all ideas that are not correct to include in the work.
The whole purpose of the paper should be portrayed in the conclusion, with a clear, brief and direct interpretation of what the paper is intended for, giving enough space for the audience to debate and further research to be done. Having decided what type of literature review you wish to carry out, the next decision to think about is what is best way to present the information to your audience.
For a small audience such as journal club, grand rounds, or a conference proceedings, an analytical review can be summarised in a short review format such as: Dabigatran increases MI and reduces mortality compared with warfarin, enoxaparin, or placebo. Alternatively you may wish to present the results of your literature review as a poster presentation such as: Poster presented by Dr.
Or publish your literature review in a journal article such as: A systematic review of the literature for severity predictors in children with sickle cell anemia. PRISMA is an evidence-based minimum set of items for reporting in systematic reviews and meta-analyses. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: Plos Medicine, 6 7:
Literature Review of Medical Errors and Misdiagnosis According to Kaiser attention to medical errors escalated over five years ago with the release of a study from the Institute of Medicine (IOM), which.
PubMed - Searching Medical Literature: Types of Medical Literature. A guide to searching medical literature using PubMed, the MEDLINE search engine from the National Library of Medicine. Abstracting and indexing services, review articles, systematic reviews, meta-analysis, practice guidelines. Tertiary Literature. Text books, encyclopedias.
Our Medical literature review services: Weekly routine plus ad hoc medical literature screening search output obtained by multiple reference databases; Standard search criteria to generate initial listings of references and abstracts;. However, the next tips on how to write a literature review medicine are as important as the previous ones that would get more insight and professionalism to the medical paper: Choose the perfect topic5/5.
No one database can search all the medical literature. Searching is an iterative process, and you will need to search several different databases. That being said if you want to do a very quick search for existing systematic reviews on your topic, search PubMed Clinical Queries using simple keywords and look in the center column of results for. As medical information specialists, MedSearch researchers can provide secondary research services in all areas of medicine and the biological sciences.